KCQ's regarding BPO

What I noticed from the beginning whilst researching BioProspect Limited (BPO) is that the Board of Directors changed dramatically over the past 5 years.  In particular, between November 2013 and July 2014 (except for the Managing Director), a whole new Board was appointed due to the resignation of all prior board members.  

On further investigation it is noted in the Annual Report that one in three non-executive directors (except the Managing Director) are required to retire by rotation at each Annual General Meeting, with each director being eligible for re-election.  Thus, it seems that all directors (except the Managing Director) have resigned from the board for the past two years. 


I was really interested to know what the reasons would be for this, so I did some digging and found out the following.

As stated in BPO's annual report: 

“the performance of the company depends upon the quality of its directors and executives.  To perform to satisfactory levels, the company must attract, motivate and retain highly skilled directors and executives.”

Mr Ben Cooper who has recently resigned from the board was originally appointed as a Director to fulfil a role specifically to search and identify opportunities for the Company.  
I really got what this company was all about when I read that - before then I could not quite get what it was that they actually did.  The website and annual reports do not contain a Vision Statement or Mission Statement which I found to be quite odd as I usually can get an insight into a company from same.
I see very clearly now that BPO is a company that searches out opportunities where they can either develop a new biotech product, purchase a trademark or intellectual rights or purchase an ownership interest in other companies.  As such, the board is constantly changing and new directors with different areas of expertise, different networks and new ideas and strategies enter the company with the view of identifying new business opportunities.  Effectively the Board of Directors is the chief decision maker.


About BPO:  The company is engaged in developing and commercialising technology in the human health and personal care, animal health and nutrition and agricultural sectors. This includes AGRIPRO® animal health and nutrition products, Qcide® a new, environmentally friendly treatment for household and agricultural pests, TERMILONE® which is the registered Trade Mark for the natural Eremophilone Oil, and REGEN® human health products. The Company also has an investment in Frontier Oil Corporation Limited an unlisted public company based in the Philippines. Located in Sydney, BioProspect is listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. 
Investment in Frontier Oil Corporation:  This acquisition came about due to an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders in 2011, whereby approval was given to change for the Company to include in its activities the exploration, development and production of oil and gas domestically and internationally and as well as other associated activities.  
Quite interesting given that the company is a biotechnology company.  What I have since learnt is that (Grey) biotechnology involves industrial processes such as the production of new chemicals or the development of new fuels for vehicles

However, this investment opportunity was in line with the Company’s strategy of increasing shareholder value.  Which effectively is every commercial company's strategy, or so I'm led to believe.

Another interesting point to note is that BioProspect issued shares to Frontier Gasfields' shareholders as part of the acquisition cost.

Moving forward to 2013/2014 F/Y: The company states that the investment climate in the biotech industry has improved and is now considering whether or not an in-specie distribution of its shares in Frontier Oil Corporation, valued at $5.3 million, is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.  

An in-specie distribution is a phrase describing the distribution of their shares in the present form, rather than selling them and distributing the cash. In specie distribution is made when cash is not readily available, or allocating the physical asset is the better alternative.

ReGen:  The company was receiving a Government grant in 2011 and 2012 for taking the ReGen Wellness product into the Asian market.  Unfortunately, sales of this product line have steadily declined over the years and the company has written down $175,000 of inventory in the 2013 profit and loss.
The company has maintained it’s intellectual property including local and international trademarks with a view to either resuming activities or selling the asset to another industry participant.  The directors have also written down goodwill $50,000 to nil.

Latest development:  






Invatec Health Pty Ltd is an associated company of BioProspect.  Invatec developed the world’s first quantitative analysis for depression.  The Company’s Heart Rate Variability (HRV) technology is based on the scientific finding that human heart rates, including certain tell tale changes, are sensitive measures for depression. The HRV technology consists of a heart monitor that sends recordings wirelessly to the internet where a proprietary algorithm analyses and delivers a report back to the clinician. The HRV technology is the first objective, evidence-based approach to the diagnosis of depression and other affective disorders. The technology has already benefited from 10 years of research and BioProspect is currently undertaking a number of pivotal trials to further validate its clinical utility.  BPO is to acquire 80% of Invatec Health - for further details regarding the acquisition please go to:

http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20131205/pdf/42ldzkmjdcbl5l.pdf

Mr Claude Solitario, who founded Invatec Health Pty Ltd in 2005 joined the board as an Executive Director.  Mr Solitario has been instrumental in the growth of Invatec since its inception.  Mr Solitario has over 25 year's commercial and research experience and brings a deep understanding of the development and commercialisation of intellectual property to BPO.

Depression is estimated to cost the Australian economy $15 billion annually, with a cost in America estimated at US$83 billion annually.  Complete roll out of the technology is due in 2014/15.

Currently, I think the major challenge the business faces is whether this new technology will be embraced by the medical profession and will prove to be a successful business strategy for BPO. 


Shareholder returns


30/06/13
30/06/12
30/06/11
30/06/10
30/06/09
Share price-cents
0.1
0.2
0.8
1.3
1.7
Shares on issue
2,873,174,372
1,612,170,347
1,116,570,347
563,113,565
487,040,944
Capitalisation
$ 2.9 m
$ 3.2 m
$ 8.9 m
$ 7.3 m
$ 8.3 m
Loss per share-cents
(0.05)
(0.2)
(0.3)
(0.6)
(0.6)




BioProspect does not currently pay dividends.  However, BPO state in their annual report that all of the company’s funds are fully invested in commercialisation of its natural and sustainable product range, for the benefit of long-term growth in shareholder value. 

Current share price:  is 0.3 cents and currently has 2,200,223 shares on issue.  It will be interesting to watch the share price especially if the HRV technology proves to be very successful.  If you are keen to keep an eye on it here's the ASX link:


Other Interests:  BioProspect has a 28.76% ownership interest in Astrum Therapeutics Pty Ltd, an unlisted Australian drug discovery company focused on type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.  However, the carrying value of the investment is recorded as nil, and the directors have resolved that in the absence of a sufficiently attractive offer, BPO will retain its current 28.76% shareholding.

Going concern:  When I first looked at BPO's financial statements and read over their website, I did have an initial query as to whether they would continue as a going concern.  The website was not giving me too much information - until I undertook a lot of research - and the financials were showing that the company was operating continually at a loss, along with a steady decline in the share price.  As stated in the notes to the 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements:


Going Concern Statement -

"As at 30 June 2013 the Company was in a net asset position of $2,538,153 (2012: $2,444,327) and had incurred losses of $1,096,713 (2012: $3,326,955) and had cash outflows from operations of $1,176,758 (2012: $1,513,183) for the year then ended.........
Based on the above factors and the Company’s history of being able to adequately raise funds the directors believe the group will be able to pay its debts as and when they fall due for a period of at least 12 months from the date of these financial statements."

BioProspect's long-term strategy:  

"Continue to evaluate new business opportunities consistent with BioProspect’s long term strategy to grow market value through the development of biotechnologies."  

I do feel that BPO appears to be meeting its long term strategy as it continues to seek out new opportunities and will continue as a going concern for the next period.  However, the company is dependent on raising capital through issuing ordinary shares, and ultimately relies on investors who believe in the company for its future.   To date, being able to adequately raise funds has proven to be quite an achievement.

Biotechnology Industry Overview:  

It is anticipated that biotechnology will underpin our economy and provide solutions to intractable problems of human and animal diseases, climate change, fuel alternatives, food security – as well as improving our quality of life.


Despite the challenges of the global economy and the degree of difficulty in building a biotechnology and life sciences sector from scratch, Australia is doing very well by any comparative measure, with an impressive return on investment from a maturing stock of quality companies. Australian biotechnology boasts a raft of success stories and a world-class industry.  To read more please go to:






  











15 comments:

  1. Hi Rae. It's interesting you say that you initially had an issue understanding what the company did. The few annual reports I have looked at read like marketing magazines. I get where you are coming from. I agree when you say that the major challenge the company faces will be the medical profession embracing this new technology. Development of new technologies always pose uptake challenges, and from what I have read, particularly in the health care industry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have to agree with you Adrian - my impression of almost every annual report I have read is a great marketing ploy. Have you taken a look at BPO's annual report/ - link on front page. It looks like its been typed up as a word document, a copy being sent to ASX, ASIC and then uploaded on their website for shareholders and stakeholders to view. I hope I'm not sounding too harsh. Am now keen to take a look at other biotech companies for a comparison. Stay tuned!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. It did look like a word document. Made it hard to read. One of the things that I found interesting about your company is that it requires all the members of the board to resign after a certain period of time. I think its a great idea. It encourages diversity, constantly brings a new and fresh perspective into the business with every new board member, preventing stagnation.

      Delete
    2. What's really interesting is that the new Executive Director, Claude Solitario, is also the founder of Invatec Health, which is an associated company of BPO who have developed the HRV technology. Also, just last week they appointed Stephen Pearce who is the CFO of Fortescue Metals Group as the advisor to the board. I've posted that ASX announcement on the front page if you want to take a read. If you take a look at the qualifications and experience of the current board members, in a nut shell, they are highly experienced at raising capital and negotiating mergers and acquisitions. A very interesting company to say the least. Cheers

      Delete
  3. Hi Rae, great Blog and I am putting you in my top 3!! In relation to marketing, my company Dior is all about that. I have 6 product segments ranging from apparel, to alcohol, to cosmetics...accessories...watches. It is all about brands that have developed through the ages, and represent perfection from word go. There is no question about what Dior does, and the marketing aspect is what it is all about. I like your discussion about change of directors for BPO. With such diverse operations, and as such, a strategy that is forever changing, you need a board that will provide you with the expertise (in alignment with the change you are always implementing). In some instances, Research and Development can be one of the hardest business ventures for shareholders to accept (and invest in). But, look out if thing go well, shares will go through the roof. A good question would be for you to try and predict what operations BPO may undertake next. From my perspective, a hard one. In the case of my company, Dior will continue as it has, selling luxury goods for a luxury margin, staying out of problematic regions, and sticking with the same (family orientated) board......some things don't change!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=BPO:AU

    Hi Rae, found the above a good read....your analysis of board composition (continuing decomposition) seems spot on. New phases, changes to strategy, the NEED to raise funds, all seem to require the correct mix of human capital to ensure value is added for your company.
    Do you think it is a coincidence that BPO includes a mirror of ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations within their annual report? Following from the ASX: Under Listing Rule 4.10.3, ASX listed entities are required to benchmark their corporate governance practices against the Council’s recommendations and, where they do not conform, to disclose that fact and the reasons why. The rule effectively encourages listed entities to adopt the Council’s recommended practices but does not force them to do so......... What do you think?


    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Kirsten, I agree re the Corporate Governance Principles. When I initially read BPO's corporate governance my first thought was, this is purely straight out of ASX Corporate Governance Principles. More importantly, did you notice that they changed their Charter in 2012 and no doubt their Charter requires them to have a female member on the Board, which took until September 2013 before her appointment. I have so much more I want to add to my blog as this type of company is something I have never come across in the past. Maybe you would agree, during our studies with accounting we have been more exposed to companies that generate at least 'operating revenue'. This company does not and after I have researched this industry, it amazes me how investors are out there who have so much belief in the biotechnology industry, and more importantly, the future of this planet, continue to invest capital into such a company. In all honesty, I'm grateful to be given this company as its opened my eyes in many ways. There is a link just above in this page that will take you to a site that will give you an overview of this industry. Cheers, Rae

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Rae....consider this paragraph of the bio industry link you kindly pointed me towards.....Since its emergence in the early to mid-nineties, the biotechnology industry in Australia has achieved a great deal. The year 2014 dawned with news that biotechnology has become a ‘20-year overnight success’ with The Age and Sydney Morning Herald (4 Jan 14) reporting that “biotech has finally boomed”. The article reported the array of successes of 2013, which included IPOs, four to nine-fold surges in share prices for a number of companies, high profile investors turning their attention to biotech and a steady flow of capital raisings that totalled $739.1 million (Biotech Daily, 2 Jan 14), the highest amount since 2007.

    You would tick the boxes for these, incorporation in 1998, IPOs, surge in share price (at some stage I am sure), high profile investors and numerous capital raisings. So, what is going wrong? Is BPO's diversification strategy not working? Consider the numerous products rolled out and investments made, and the value of the success of these. According to your company, in the interest of increasing shareholder value, they sell its 50% shareholding in Frontier Gasfields (the subsidiary of Frontier Oil) in exchange for 430,000,000 newly issued shares in Frontier Oil......so after a big list of events such as agreements, announcements, etc.......the end result is BPO is expecting to benefit 5.2 million (after the IPO of Frontier Oil, 4th Quarter, Philippines Stock Exchange,). No wonder their Board needs specialised knowledge base!!

    What about the strategy review considered, whether or not an in-specie distribution of remaining shares in Frontier Oil Corporation is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

    An example of an in specie distribution is a stock dividend, which can be distributed to investors when cash is in short supply. It is common to see an in specie distribution made in the form of fractional shares such as 0.5 shares for each share held. Note 26 (event after the reporting period) also touches on this in specie (something I have not heard of before)

    Cash is king, and you struggle with this. Note 25 says you rely on, inter alia, government tax incentives for short term survival (in Australia's political environment at the moment).
    I also read somewhere (cant remember) that one of you board members has a priority to ensure funding was going to be available when needed for your HRV....another variable. Let me know how you go with your company. I am going to try and finish my assignment this weekend. But, I will always be interested to discuss BPO. Very interesting Rae!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is good to see that your company is innovating, as I have found that when my company, Bradken Limited went downhill, it was innovation and mergers that kept them afloat. I wonder what BioProspect will come up with. They appear to have some strong financial challenges ahead.

    Regards,
    Sheena
    http://sheenalearnsaccounting.blogspot.com.au/

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes - what seems to keep this company afloat is the ability to raise capital through issuing shares and options - that is their only source of revenue currently. Their next hopeful success is the HRV technology and the smart phone app. What concerns me is that I have looked at the criteria for Assignment 2 - how am I to come up with five products or services to work with? This company only owns trademarks and intellectual rights. Certainly a challenge to say the least!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very interesting blog the diversity of your assigned company makes for an interesting company profile.
    I believe that the diversity could be an asset, but to some extent they seem to operating on a wing and a prayer, the fact that the board changes in the way that it dose could also be quite challenging in that there is a definite lack of continuity in their decision making, I mean for me it would be a concern if I were to look at investing, Yes you need to take a calculated risk in business but in this instance you are continually working with an unknown quantity. It looks to me that the strat planning and company vision exist in the eyes of the Managing Director he seems to be the only constant.
    Great work, very exciting.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, it seems that currently they are putting all their eggs into one basket - the 80% acquisition of Invatec Health with the anticipation of the HRV technology being their next successful venture. It will certainly be very interesting to stay tuned to this company especially since they have just appointed Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of Fortescue Metals Group Ltd, as an Advisor to the Board. He has the reputation of raising $12 billion to support the growth of Fortescue's iron ore operations. I do agree with you, it would be a concern if I were looking at investing in this company, but I do believe that their are investors who like to take a gamble.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Rae you mentioned that the previous two years of board members resigned but with the option of reapplying, were any reinstated? If the aim was to encourage new and innovative people to the board are they saying they failed to do so in the past 2 years? In my view a risky move. I'm sorry but if I had a spare bucket of money I'm not sure I would invest in a company that models it's board on how well they raise capital. I don't think you've been harsh on your assessment of BPO...In fact I think you've nailed it !

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hi Stephney, No, none were reinstated at all. Let's not forget that its the shareholders who appoint the board. So obviously someone's "calling the shots". I've tried to do some searching to see who the major shareholders are who hold the voting rights but have not been successful so far. Will keep at it though. Thanks Steph appreciate your comments. Stay in touch.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete